Dawkins, a most ardent supporter of Darwinism, has long accounted for
the perfect creation of the universe in terms of the theory of
evolution, which has lately suffered a global collapse. In his recent
writings and interviews, however, Dawkins has started to express that "life cannot form by chance." It is an absence of sense and reason to support evolution on one hand
and to state that life cannot come about by chance on the other. That
is due to the fact that according to the theory of evolution, which
Dawkins supports, the existence of life is based on entirely random
Dawkins has realized that he can get
nowhere with the scenario of chance. But, he is now in the logical
impasse as he basically claims that "evolution cannot be a result of
coincidences, but has occurred by means of coincidences." What he
should realize is that demagogy no longer works.
Dawkins sincerely believes in this theory, we'd like to invite him to
Turkey, or else we could come to UK to have a discussion. Dawkins
should clarify hundreds of questions, only a few of which are listed
below, before the cameras. So we, as well as the public, will be able
to hear what he has to say. Obviously, it's no good to engage in
unilateral programs. Moreover, with such an attitude Dawkins only
deceives himself. Let us send the first 4 volumes of Atlas of Creation to Mr. Dawkins, and let him examine the photographs of the fossils
therein which have not changed at all over the hundreds of millions of
years. And let him account for them in evolutionary terms according to
his much-publicized logic—if he can!
- Archeological researches unearthed over a hundred million fossils, proving that life forms were created out of nothing.
Still, there is not a single transitional fossil supporting the theory
of evolution. If Dawkins is sincere in his claim, he should bring a
transitional fossil and announce it to the public as "a transitional
- The odds against a functional protein emerging randomly is 10950 to 1—a practical impossibility. (In mathematics, probabilities smaller than 1 over 1050 are accepted as "zero probability.") If Dawkins is honest, he should point at a mass of proteins that formed
by chance or by means of the methods he espouses. Let Dawkins explain
us how he can account for the origin of life in evolutionary terms,
when even a single protein—the building block of life—cannot form by
- Let Dawkins explain us how
all colorful, lively, three-dimensional and perfectly clear images,
shortly life itself, can form in the pitch dark human brain and who
sees this image in the brain!
Dawkins explain us in evolutionary terms how conversations, music and
all other sounds form in the sound-isolated brain; who listens to and
enjoys these sounds, who knows their meaning, who reflects on them
consciously and who answers back these sounds!
Dawkins ask the same questions to us, and let us give our answers. Let
us supply our evidence, and let him bring his—if he has any. Then let
the public decide who is right. We want the public to know on a larger
scale how Darwinism is a false theory and how it is the greatest
deception of the world's history. We are confident that the days are
soon to come when people will laugh, asking themselves "How could we
ever believe this theory?" In near future, people will be wondering
with amazement how they could ever have been taken in by it. In fact,
this is already occurring, at an ever-increasing momentum. World-wide polls reveal statistical data proving this state of affairs.
tried to be kept alive by engaging in demagogy and propaganda, has been
refuted in all spheres and it is now widely recognized that it's no
longer possible to defend Darwinism by demagogy. Dawkins' recent
statement along the logic that "evolution cannot be a result of
coincidences, but has occurred by means of coincidences" is nothing but
a laughable misery of reason.
you can see in the above movie, unable to provide a reasonable answer,
Richard Dawkins paused a long time when asked to "give an example of a
If he answers
(!) our above questions in the same way as he did in this interview,
then our questions will remain unanswered. Therefore, we expect him to
give reasonable, clear answers based on evidence, and hope he will
accept our invitation.
Darwin, Letter to William Graham, 1881. Francis Darwin, The Life and
Letters of Charles Darwin, No. 1, p. 285 (New York: Basic Books, 1959)